The prevalence of English as second language users in America's schools has led to the need for teachers who have a sound knowledge base of research proven theories, techniques, methods, and assessment for teaching literacy to such populations. This course is designed to help inservice teachers develop the skills and practices necessary to be facilitators of language and academic development of K-12 learners whose native tongue is other than English.
Linguistically Diverse Students and Literacy is a forty five-hour, 3 graduate credit course taught online. Modules 11-13 are hands on modules during which students will demonstrate their level of competency with course content by analyzing instructional models, creating appropriate lesson plans, and analyzing instructional materials.
This course is offered over a period of 15 weeks. Modules are completed over the 15-week period pending length of assignments per week.
Students may use either a Macintosh computer or a PC with Windows 2000 or higher. Students should possess basic word processing skills and have Internet access as well as an active email account. Students also are expected to have a basic knowledge of how to use a Web browser, such as Internet Explorer, Mozilla Firefox, Safari, etc.
The required textbook for this course is: Rothenberg, C. & Fisher, D. (2007) Teaching English language learners: A differentiated approach. Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River, NJ. Recommended Reading List provided each term. Course content includes many online readings, website reviews, research reading assignments and forum postings.
Objective: In this beginning exercise, students and the instructor will introduce themselves in the forum. The students have this first week to acquaint themselves with the format of the course, the textbook, and the methods of communication.
Objectives:
Objectives:
Objectives:
Objectives:
Objective:
Objective:
Objectives:
Objectives:
Objective:
Objectives:
Objective:
Objective:
Contents:
Class participants will read the class website and the related Internet links provided to find information on the various approaches for involving parents in the ESOL literacy program as well as plans for effective school home communication. A review of the web resources and class website is required.
| Requirements | Points |
| Forum Discussions | 10 |
| Module Assignments | 70 |
| Reflections | 70 |
| Lesson Plans | 40 |
| Total | 190 |
Grades
190-177 - A
176-163 - B
162-148 - C
Participants guarantee that all academic class work is original. Any academic dishonesty or plagiarism (to take ideas, writings, etc. from another and offer them as one's own), is a violation of student academic behavior standards as outlined by the Teacher Education University catalog and is subject to academic disciplinary action.
Computers and English for Speakers of Other Languages. (2007) Integrating technology in ESOL programs. http://tech.worlded.org/docs/cesol/links.htm.
Cummins, J. (2003) Reading and the bilingual student: Fact and friction. In Garcia, G. (Ed.), English learners: Reaching the level of English literacy (pp 227-258). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Dutro, S. & Moran, C. (2003) Rethinking English language instruction: An architectural approach. In Garcia, G. (Ed.), English learners: Reaching the highest level of English literacy (pp.227-258). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Kohn, A. (2004) What does it mean to be well educated? And more essays on standards, grading, and other follies. Boston: Beacon Press.
National Center for Educational Statistics. (2003) The nation's report card: Writing highlights 2000. http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2003529
Rock, M. L. (2004) Graphic organizers: Tools to build behavioral literacy and foster emotional competency. Intervention in School and Clinic, 40(1), 10-37.
Tompkins, G. E. & Blanchfield, C. (2004) Teaching vocabulary: 50 creative strategies, grades K-12. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
Walqui, A. (2003) Conceptual framework: Scaffolding instruction for English learners. San Francisco: WestEd.
Teacher Education University reserves the right to adjust and adapt this syllabus as necessary.

Teacher Education University is accredited by the Distance Education and Training Council (DETC). The Accrediting Commission of the Distance Education and Training Council is listed by the U.S. Department of Education as a nationally recognized accrediting agency and is a recognized member of the Council for Higher Education Accreditation.