Contact For More Information! Download our Current Catalog!

Teaching Gifted & Talented Students

ED 623

Syllabus

Course Description


Teaching gifted students provides classroom teachers the strategies and techniques they can use to meet the academic and emotional needs of the gifted and talented. Course content includes practical approaches for challenging the most able students in the regular classroom, pull-out, or full-time classes for gifted students. A course emphasis is upon ways of knowing (epistemology) unique to gifted students, and an appropriate pedagogy to specifically enhance each student's giftedness.

Objectives


Curriculum Design

Teaching Gifted & Talented Students is a forty five-hour, 3 graduate credit course taught online.

Time Requirements

This course is offered over a period of 15 weeks. Modules are completed over the 15-week period pending length of assignments per week.

One semester credit equals fifteen (15) hours of online class time. Each course is equivalent to three (3) semester credit hours.

A minimum of one hundred thirty five (135) hours should be anticipated for completion of the course. This includes forty five (45) hours of direct contact and ninety (90) hours in preparation and study; three (3) and six (6) per week respectively.

Skill and Hardware Requirements

Students may use either a Macintosh computer or a PC with Windows 2000 or higher. Students should possess basic word processing skills and have Internet access as well as an active email account. Students also are expected to have a basic knowledge of how to use a Web browser, such as Internet Explorer, Mozilla Firefox, Safari, etc.

Course Materials

The required textbook for this course is When Gifted Kids Don't have All the Answers by Jim Delisle & Judy Galbraith, Free Spirit Publishing, 2002. A variety of readings will be referenced throughout the course. In addition, selected Web resources will be read and reviewed.

Course Outline

Module One:

 


Module Two:

 


Module Three:


Module Four:

 


Module Five:

 


Module Six:

 


Module Seven:

 


Module Eight:

 


Module Nine:

 


Module Ten:

 


Course Requirements:

  1. Forum Activities - Actively participate in all Forum activities. If you post your assignment early, you must go back in the Forum and dialogue with your colleagues. 'I agree' types of replys do not count for credit towards fulfilling this requirement.
  2. Assignments - Complete all reading assignments in the textbook, Web sites, and research articles or best practices and answer questions presented in the assignment section. Complete each assignment and send it in the body of an e-mail message.

Grades
100-93 - A
85-92 - B
75-84 - C

 

Grading Criteria

Assignments Maximum Points
Introduction Forum Posting 2 Points
Module 1 Reflection Part 1 5 Points
Module 1 Reflection Part 2 5 Points
Module 1 Forum Posting 2 Points
Module 2 Reflection 5 Points
Module 3 Reflection Part 1 5 Points
Module 3 Reflection Part 2 5 Points
Module 4 Reflection Part 1 5 Points
Module 4 Reflection Part 2 5 Points
Module 4 Reflection Part 3 10 Points
Module 5 Reflection Part 1 5 Points
Module 5 Reflection Part 2 2 Points
Module 6 Forum Posting 2 Points
Module 6 Reflection Part 1 5 Points
Module 6 Reflection Part 2 5 Points
Module 7 Reflection 5 Points
Module 8 Reflection 5 Points
Module 8 Forum Posting 2 Points
Module 9 Reflection 5 Points
Module 10 Reflection Part 1 5 Points
Module 10 Reflection Part 2 5 Points
Module 10 Forum Posting 2 Points

Credit hours

One semester credit equals fifteen (15) hours of online class time.  Each course is equivalent to three (3) semester credit hours.
A minimum of one hundred thirty five (135) hours should be anticipated for completion of the course. This includes forty five (45) hours of direct contact and ninety (90) hours in preparation and study; three (3) and six (6) per week respectively.

 


Student Academic Integrity

Principles of academic integrity refer to cheating and plagiarism. Participants guarantee that all academic class work is original. Any academic dishonesty or plagiarism is a violation of student academic behavior standards and are subject to disciplinary action. Plagiarism is defined as taking ideas, writings, etc. from another and offering them as one’s own. Academic dishonesty is defined as practicing dishonesty or misrepresentation of facts. All forms of dishonesty and intent to defraud through falsification are considered cheating. Violation of these principles will merit a failing grade in the course in which the violation is documented.

 

Privacy Rights and Confidentiality

In accordance with the provisions of the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974 (Buckley Amendment), Teacher Education University honors student privacy and protects the confidentiality of educational records and the rights of students to inspect and review these records. Only upon the written request of the student may information collected by the University be released. Specific transcript information is not available for general statistical purposes.

Bibliography

Berndt, D.J., Kaiser, C.F. & Van Aaalst, F. (1982).  Depression and self-actualization in gifted adolescents.  Journal of Clinical Psychology 38: 142-150.

Boyer, A. (1989).  Surviving the blessing: Parenting the highly gifted child.  Understanding Our Gifted, 1 (3), pp. 5, 17, 20-21.

Cohen, LeoNora M.  Mapping the Domains of Ignorance and Knowledge in Gifted Education.  Roeper Review February/March 1996, Vol. 18 No. 3 p. 183.

Daniel, N. & Cox, J. (1988).  Flexible pacing for able learners.  Reston, VA: The Council for Exceptional Children.  (ED 298 725)

Grost, A. (1970).  Genius in Residence.  Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Higham, S. & Buescher, T.M. (1987).  What young gifted adolescents understand about feeling different.  In T.M. Buescher (Ed.), Understanding gifted and talented adolescents (pp. 26-30).  Evanston, IL: The Center for Talent Development, Northwestern University.

Janos, P.M. & Robinson, N.M. (1985).  The performance of students in a program of radical acceleration at the university level.  Gifted Child Quarterly, 29 (4), 175-179.

Hildreth, D. & Sawyer, P. (2001). Reinvigorating the professorate: Reflections about teaching academically gifted youth. Roeper Review. 23.

Kaiser, C.F. & Berndt, D.J. (1985).  Predictors of loneliness in the gifted adolescent.  Gifted Child Quarterly 29: 74-77.

Kline, B.E. & Meckstroth, E.A. (1985).  Understanding and encouraging the exceptionally gifted.  Roeper Review, 8 (1), 24-30.

Lewis, G. (1984).  Alternatives to acceleration for the highly gifted child.  Roeper Review, 6 (3), 133-136.

Powell, P.M. & Haden, T. (1987).  The intellectual and psychological nature of extreme giftedness.  Roeper Review, 6 (3), 127-130.

Rogers, Karen, A Study of 241 Profoundly Gifted Children.  Online Document, web address: http://www.gifteddevelopment.com/articles/astudyof241extraordgc.htm, June 27, 1998.

Tolan, S.S. (1989).  Special problems of young highly gifted children.  Understanding Our Gifted, 1 (5), 1, 7-10.

Teacher Education University reserves the right to adjust and adapt this syllabus as necessary.

 





Educator Preparation Institute Earn Graduate Credit Toward Your Master's Degree
 
Teacher Education University